jump to navigation

Lost a Few Finesses September 2, 2010

Posted by justinlall in Blog, Tournament Report.
Tags: , ,
1 comment so far

I played in the first knockout of the Dallas regional last night and all day today. My team was Jeremy Fournier, Chris Hamman, and Bart Bramley. It was fun to play “for fun” with 3 of my really good friends, I rarely do that these days.

The first set of the finals was a wild one with a lot of interesting hands. This one was definitely my favorite though.

White/Red I picked up:

T3
A862
82
AQJT9

My partner opened a gambling 3N, showing a solid 7 or 8 card minor and no side ace or king. What would you bid?

I actually think passing is quite reasonable and possibly correct. You are cold unless they run five spades. Sometimes even when that is possible they make the wrong lead, and sometimes partner has 3 spades and they’re 4-4. More importantly, even if it’s reasonably likely they’ll run 5 spades it might still be right to pass since 5 might be down anyways.

On the other hand, I feel like they will very often be leading spades; they rate to have the most honors in that suit (and of course they’ll make an aggressive lead versus a gambling 3N), and since that is our short suit it will also often be their longest. I think not playing some game is too wimpy; both should have enough chances to be worth bidding.

Rightly or wrongly, I chose to bid 5, figuring it will be better to play it from my side since I might get a club lead.

My LHO led the 4 and this is what I saw

Q62
74
AKQJ9763

T3
A862
82
AQJT9

This lead has stopped me from being able to ruff a spade in my hand, so I only have 10 tricks; 8 diamonds and 2 aces. I would like to set up and enjoy my clubs, but I only have one sure entry to my hand.

If the diamond ten was stiff, my 8 would be a second entry. However, I saw a better chance. Maybe my LHO has the ten and I could run this to my 8! I also saw some element of restricted choice on the lead, with T4 of diamonds they would always lead low, but with 54 they might lead either. They also might have T54 (restricted choice on that also). This means when LHO does not have a singleton, he is almost 3 to 1 to have to ten of diamonds.

On top of that, there is one other gain to ducking this trick. If it is RHO with Tx, I might make it after losing a trump trick. RHO will have to guess which major to play, and if he guesses to play hearts I can take a ruffing finesse in clubs and get back to my hand. So I would gain multiple tricks back for the sacrifice of one.

It should be said, though, that if I pop ace and the ten doesn’t drop while having no legitimate chances I still might make. I would come to the heart ace and lead the 9 of clubs from my hand, hoping to catch LHO sleeping and not covering with the king if he has it. This would be my line would be very strong against weak opponents for sure (who would never think to cover), but I think my LHO was good enough to not fall for that. It still might be the wrong line even against weak opponents since if my diamond “finesse” wins, I am cold no matter who has the K, while the swindle requires a finesse if the T doesn’t drop even if they will never cover with the king on my left.

I went for it and ducked, and my RHO won with the ten. He returned a heart, so I won the ace and then took a ruffing club finesse which lost, so I was down 2, losing the not-so-obvious tricks of 1 diamond, 1 club, and 2 spades.

Sadly, RHO had stiff ten of diamonds, and 3N was also cold.

And to think my partner thought he had a solid suit!

Venting April 12, 2009

Posted by justinlall in The Bet.
Tags: ,
6 comments

Josh and I put a lot of hours in today for the bet, playing 8 tourneys in all. Since we are sick, we both also played more tourneys when the other person wanted a break.

My results today were pretty terrible. I definitely didn’t play great, but the bad luck I was getting on slam hands was just insane. Here is an example:

Kxx
K
AQ9xx
Txxx

AJ
Axx
Jx
AJ9xxx

You do quite well to bid 6 after opening 1N, and receive a heart lead. How do you play?

The best idea here is to strip out the major suits, and go ace and a club. True, you lose to KQx onside now if the DK was onside all along, but you pick up Hx of clubs with the DK on your right, a much more likely combination. So win the heart in dummy and lead a club (maybe they split), then strip the majors and exit a club. Unfortunately it was KQx onside, so your good play is not rewarded.

Note that on a spade lead you have a pitch for your diamond so could safety play the trumps. This is not horrible luck, but if stuff like this happens to you 5 times in a row you can get a little frustrated.

Anyways, luckily Josh didn’t have a great day either so I’m still very much in this. When the luck turns I have little doubt that I wll start crushing :)

Interesting Slam Hand April 8, 2009

Posted by justinlall in Blog.
Tags: ,
5 comments

Playing in a BBO match today I got to this very interesting 6:

KQ84
T8
A76
AQ32

AJT7
AQ953
T
KJ9

I got the 8 lead, 3rd from even, low from odd. That means they probably have either 4 or 6 diamonds. After winning the ace, we have our first big decision. We can make the intuitive play of ruffing a diamond, or we can play a heart to the queen first. Lets compare those two lines.

Line A: Ruffing a diamond. If we are able to ruff a diamond, play two trumps ending in dummy, and then ruff another diamond we are cold with trumps splitting. We will take 1 heart, 4 clubs, 4 spades, 1 diamond, and 2 ruffs. However, what do we do if trumps are 4-1? If we ruff another diamond in our hand we will set up the 9xxx of spades for a trick. Then we can just play clubs letting them ruff, and eventually take a heart finesse. If it is stiff 9 of spades things get even more complicated, but that is unlikely so we’ll ignore it. So line A basically wins on all 3-2 trumps, and half of the 4-1 trumps. That is about 82 %.

Line B: Hooking the heart first. If the hook wins we are basically cold barring 5-1 hearts. We will play ace of hearts, heart ruff high if lefty follows, and if necessary ruff another heart. We do risk losing when RHO has Kx of hearts and 9xxx of spades. If the heart hook loses and the expected diamond comes back we can revert to line A, making on 3-2 trumps, plus some stiff 9 combinations. However, we have the upside that if LHO shows out on the second round of spades we can try the desperation play of pulling trumps, hooking the heart jack, and making if they’re 3-3 also. This is quite good, I make it in the 85 % range.

Line B seems better by a fair margin. At the table I chose Line A and something very interesting happened. After ruffing a diamond and playing the ace of spades the stiff 9 did come down. I played another spade and LHO pitched a diamond (which makes it look like he has 6 of them unless he’s very clever). Now there are again two possible lines.

Line A: Overtake, ruff a diamond, and play 3 rounds of clubs. If that lives you’re home, otherwise you need a heart hook. It is hard to calculate the odds of this since it depends on how many empty spaces they have in their hand, but if diamonds are 6-3 and spades are 4-1 then both east and west have the same amount of empty spaces. This bodes well for 3 rounds of clubs living.

Line B: Overtake and run the ten of hearts. If the jack is onside you’re home. If the heart loses to the jack and a diamond comes back then you make on 3-3 clubs or the heart king onside. If they return a more accurate club you’ll need the heart king onside to make, as well as either 3-3 hearts or 3-3 clubs. If RHO had Kx of hearts he should have covered the ten, in which case you can fall back on 33 clubs. Very complicated, but I make Line A slightly better because we think diamonds are 6-3.

I did take Line A, and RHO had a stiff club and no K, but did have the J, so this was a disaster.

Also, LHO had falsecarded their lead with KJ8xx! Well done to them!

Baller April 2, 2009

Posted by justinlall in Blog.
Tags: ,
add a comment

I played at the club with Patty last night for the first time in forever and we managed to win with a 69%. Still got it!

Here was an interesting play problem:

AJ932
A6
852
J63

5
Q987532
KQ3
A2

You open 1, partner bids 1, RHO makes a takeout double and you bid 2 which ends the auction. Partner was a little conservative in the auction, but you open pretty light NV so it’s understandable.

You receive the club ten lead. Plan the play before reading on.

The key to this hand is the heart suit. The normal play is to play the ace and lead up to the queen. This picks up stiff K anywhere, any 2-2, or king third on your right. There are two problems with that play on this hand, though. For starters, you need to lead up to your diamonds twice, and have only 2 entries in dummy. This means you can’t also lead up to your heart, so you can’t pick up king third of hearts on your right. The second problem is that RHO is quite a bit more likely to have a stiff in hearts than LHO given her takeout double of the majors.

So the question is, what is our alternative. Consider the effect of leading the queen from your hand. This loses a trick when either player has stiff K of hearts, but it gains when RHO has stiff J or stiff T. We also gain a trick when LHO has KJTx of hearts (though this is discounted by RHO’s failure to balance). The only downside is that LHO is going to be able to get a diamond ruff if she has a doubleton diamond and the defense figures it out. However, since LHO is very unlikely to have stiff king of hearts as we have already established, leading the queen from hand is still much better.

When you lead the queen out of your hand you are gratified to see LHO play the king and RHO the ten. Be careful and remember to play a diamond from dummy now rather than continuing to pull trumps, and you will make 4. Well done!

This is how I played it, but it didn’t even matter much since the field was going down in 4. Oh well, a well played hand is it’s own reward right?

Ask Justin 2 April 1, 2009

Posted by justinlall in Ask Justin.
Tags: ,
1 comment so far

Dear Justin,

What is the best way to play 3N?

AJ9x
xx
xxx
Q9xx

K8x
QTx
KQJx
AKx

Imps love all

(2)* p (3) 3N

2 is often a five card suit.

T1:
H, small, jack, queen.

If you play clubs, RHO drops the ten on the second round.

Dean

It seems safe to assume hearts are 5-3 since RHO probably wouldn’t raise a partner who often has 5 on Jx. We need to figure out the best way to pick up the black suits for 8 tricks since we have 5 fast losers right now.

I think it’s right to start spades immediately. If LHO has stiff queen of spades we need to keep the club queen as an entry in dummy, and we want to delay the club guess as long as possible. One thing I would never think about doing is leading the J from dummy at some point trying to pick up Txx of spades on our left. It’s too big of a play for no reason, LHO could just as easily have the Q and open 2 .

So I’d start with a spade to the jack. If LHO plays the Q I will play small to the 8 on the way back. Yes this means I’m being burned by a great falsecard from QT, but you just have to pay off to that. If the jack wins I’ll play small back to the king in case RHO has Tx. After that I’ll run the spades and then try clubs.

After AK of clubs when the ten drops on my right, I’ll hook LHO for Jxxx unless they also had 4 spades. We have restricted choice on RHO, and LHO is more likely to be 3514 for a preempt than 3523. Again, I don’t think a jack would deter LHO from preempting.

My play on this hand was decidedly unfancy. That’s usually the right way to play.

Old Position, New Twist September 5, 2006

Posted by justinlall in Blog.
Tags: ,
6 comments

One of my favorite bridge stories occurred at the San Antonio bridge club several years ago. I was playing a contract against a very sweet but completely clueless little old lady. I needed to play AT9 of clubs opposite Kxx for no losers so I stripped the hand and put her in to break the suit for me. Without a care in the world she put the queen of clubs on the table. Ordinarily, one should play for this to be from Qxx based on restricted choice (the defense must exit an honor or you have no chance to guess the suit). In this case however, I was confident that this lady had the QJx otherwise she would never exit with an honor. I played accordingly and went down! She had found the Q play from Qxx. When I congratulated her for her excellent play she had no idea what I was talking about. She found it to be nothing more than routine.

Aaron Haspel, as an unfortunate result of being a good friend of mine, has had to suffer through that sad story dozens of times. I’m sure it was on his mind when, playing against me, he wound up in 4 with these cards:

KQ53
K75
AQ6
842

AJ972
AT9
J52
Q9

In the auction I had made a takeout double of 1 on his left and then they had a free run. On the ace of clubs lead his RHO played the jack, and I continued with king and another club which he ruffed. I had shown up with the AK of clubs and had to have the king of diamonds for my bid. Aaron now saw that the best possible way home would be to strip everything but hearts and put me in with a diamond (seem familiar?). He started by drawing two rounds of trumps, everybody following. Now he finessed against the diamond king, cashed the ace, and exited with his last one. I was in with the king and produced…the queen of hearts! Putting yourself into Aaron’s seat, what would you do now? Before immediately deciding to play for split honors based on the previous story, let’s think about this a little deeper.

There is a key difference between the hand in my story and the one Aaron was playing. Here there is not restricted choice on the Q, assuming I am a good defender. As I have only shown up with AK, K and have followed to 2 spades, I know that declarer has already placed me with the Q for my bid. Accordingly, with QJ I MUST play the queen, otherwise Aaron will know that I still have it in my hand. This means it’s not clear what the percentage play is in hearts. To figure it out we need to calculate the number of possible QJx(x) combinations and weigh it against the number of Qxx(x) combinations. If I have 3 hearts, there are 4 QJx’s possible and 6 Qxx’s possible. If I have 4 hearts there are 6 QJxx’s possible and 4 Qxxx’s possible! Based on the club and diamond cards played, Aaron felt that I was most likely to be 2344 or 2335 making it percentage to play for Qxx(x) if I would also always exit with the Q from that holding too. But would I?

We’ve established that I should clearly play the Q from QJx(x), but that is not so clear from Qxx(x). Remember, I’m not looking at the T or 9 in dummy. Therefore, if Aaron had started with ATx of hearts I could get out with a low one and guarantee a set. Only getting out with the queen would give away the contract. I would have to know that Aaron has AT9 specifically to know that it’s right to exit with the Q. Amazingly, I should know just that. If he had had ATx of hearts his only shot at the contract would be to find me with the QJ of hearts, and exit with 3 rounds of hearts instead of 3 rounds of diamonds. If I did have the QJ of hearts, I would be forced to lead away from the K. For Aaron’s line to make any sense, he must have AT9 specifically.

After weighing these considerations carefully, Aaron did play for split honors and was right. After I gave him kudos on his nice play, he told me that it was routine.

UPDATE: It has come to my attention that my math on the number of possible QJx(x) combinations was wrong. In fact, it was perfect if there were SIX missing hearts, but there are actually 7. Brilliant! This means there are more Qxx combinations than QJx which makes Aaron’s play mathematically correct even if he could not read my shape.

A Comedy of Errors May 1, 2006

Posted by justinlall in Blog.
Tags: ,
4 comments

Bridge is often like a ping-pong match. Sometimes the declarer will make a play that will allow the contract to make… unless the defender finds the perfect counter… to which declarer counters… and back and fourth they go. More often, it’s the opposite. A hand I played online against a couple of friends recently was exactly like this.

Vulnerable against not, I picked up QJ9642 KQ6 K 962. My partner opened 1, RHO bid 1 and I bid 1. LHO raised to 2 and partner raised to 2. I wasn’t sure if he played support doubles here as he was a pick up partner, but I had an easy 4 bid either way. However, RHO butted in with 4 first. Obviously he had a shapely hand and was trying to bully us out of the hand. I bid 4, and LHO Xed. I suspected RHO had nothing and LHO didn’t realize this, so I XXed. It figured to be down 1 at most which is good odds, plus the chance that RHO runs to 5. As it was everyone passed and I got the 3 of hearts lead (3/5th).

I was now playing 4XX with:

A53 7 A8732 KQJ4 opposite
QJ9642 KQ6 K 962.

Aside from dummy only having 3 spades, he had a very good hand. I was sure all the spades were on my left from the bidding though, so it looked like I had 2 trumps and 2 aces to lose. RHO won the ace of hearts and shifted to the queen of diamonds. I took it and led the queen of spades. LHO covered with the king and RHO not surprisingly showed out. Now I ruffed a diamond to shorten myself, and led a club. LHO won the ace and played another one. I was at the cross roads now. If LHO was 4342 I needed to play ace of diamonds pitching a club, ruff a diamond, cash my hearts and exit a low spade to endplay LHO. However, if LHO was 4333 I needed to cash a club, ruff a diamond, cash my hearts and exit a spade. From the carding I felt very confident that LHO was 4333, so I took the indicated line and LHO was endplayed into leading a trump into my J9.

Could the defense have done anything? Let’s go back to when I led the spade queen. If LHO ducks I lose an entry to dummy. I can never ruff a heart or lead a spade to the ace or the endplay will automatically fail. So I must lead a club. Assuming LHO wins and continues clubs, I can only ruff two diamonds with my 2 club entries. In the end game I’m stuck in my hand J9x of spades opposite Ax and a diamond. Ducking a spade this time won’t work as LHO can exit a spade into the stiff ace.

Now let’s go back even further. My diamond king has suddenly transformed into a small one. How would I play then? I’m quite confident I would win the diamond ace and ruff a diamond immediately. Now if I lead the spade queen and it gets ducked, I lead a club again. LHO can win and lead a club, but I now ruff a diamond, cash 2 hearts and cross to dummy with a club. I’ve achieved the same endgame, J9x of spades opposite Ax of spades and a diamond but this time I’m in dummy. I now ruff a diamond and when LHO overruffs he is endplayed into leading away from his KT of spades. The diamond king was a mirage. Winning the ace and overtaking is actually an obvious play; hopefully I’d find it if I were playing in something more serious.

Does all this mean I was cold? Nope, if we go back even further to the point where RHO returned the diamond queen, we see that his best plan would be to attack our entries. If he plays a club and LHO continues I lose an entry. So long as LHO doesn’t cover the queen of spades I am toast.

Overall just a comedy of errors.

Right or Wrong? January 17, 2006

Posted by justinlall in Articles.
Tags: ,
11 comments

I had a very interesting play problem come up in the NAOP. It was the final day and we were playing against one of the best pairs in the room. We had a great game going and I thought we were probably qualifying at that point but there were still about 8 rounds left to play. I was in 3N with these two hands:

KJT93
82
J97
QT3

AQ2
AQJT
QT2
A42

The auction was 2N p 3N. This is a typical “insane” matchpoint auction for us. LHO leads the ace of diamonds (asking for attitude). RHO plays the 6. Now LHO returns the 8 of diamonds, I play the jack from dummy and rho plays the 4. What next?

We have 5 spades, 1 heart, 1 club and 1 diamond. The obvious thing to do would be to finesse the heart and then try finessing it again. But what was the 8 of diamonds? It was a suit preference card indicating a heart card. I honestly believe the least falsecarded signal is suit preference, even though my LHO is a very strong player I took it to probably be a true card. I was also confident that if he had 5 diamonds he certainly had a king. Good players will almost always lead small from AKxxx if they have no side entry. If LHO has 5 diamonds and the heart king he will be strip squeezed on the run of the spades.

I thought for a long time and decided to run spades. LHO started with 2 spades and pitched a low club (encouraging) followed by 2 low hearts. RHO pitched 2 low clubs (encouraging). From my hand I pitched a heart and a club. This was the end position:


82
9
QT3


AQJ
Q
A4

If LHO came down to the guarded heart king and started with 5 diamonds, that only left room for one club. In that position my winning line is to cash the club ace and get out a diamond (see why I didn’t pitch a diamond from my hand?). Given that I believe the diamond 8 this is the most likely layout. However, I had a lot of extraneous things to consider.

  • Did LHO stiff his HK and hold on to 2 clubs? This was possible to do in tempo since I took so long to play. I didn’t think it was likely because of another pattern people seem to have. When they figure out early on in the play they need to stiff their king, they do it immediately. I’m pretty sure if LHO wanted to go that route he would pitch heart, heart, club in that order.
  • Did LHO falsecard the D8? If he had the club king and the AK of diamonds, looking at 7 points in dummy and 20-21 in my hand he knows partner has very little. A falsecard is very possible, especially since even if his partner does have an entry like the queen of spades, LHO has a slow entry not a quick one so it’s not that important. However, again few people falsecard suit preference and it’s important to remember not to give your opps too much credit.
  • Did LHO start with 4 diamonds all along? With AK85 he might have chosen to lead a high diamond then had nothing better to do but continue. In this scenario he might have chosen a different lead (a major is preferable on this auction) and he would need the 5 to know that playing the 8 is safe.
  • If LHO does have xx Kxxx AKxxx xx like I think, what will happen to 4 spades? That is the field contract. LHO will lead 3 rounds of diamonds and his partner will ruff and lead back a heart. The clubs then go away on the hearts, so I’d be down one. So even if I go down 1 in 3N I will get an average.

At the table I decided the first 3 inferences were strong but not sure, maybe 80 % each. However, when combined that makes LHO having the hand I think he has to only be a 50/50 shot. If the heart hook is on or diamonds are 4-3, I’m going to get a good result for playing in 3N if I just finesse now. I decided the risk wasn’t worth it and I hooked a heart and went down 1. Sure enough we got an average board, and making would have been a top. LHO did have 2452 with the HK.

Looking back on it I’m not sure if I did the right thing. Very often I will play a hand to have a guess in the end position and then back my judgment about the layout 100 %. If I was playing my A game and was feeling very confident I’m sure instead of thinking my inferences were 80 % I would have thought they were 100 % and gone for it. I felt bad for not backing up my judgment in this case because it is one of my strengths in declarer play. However, we did get an average and we did qualify for the nationals. Had I gone for it and gone down for a zero, we wouldn’t have qualified. From that point of view I did the right thing.

I still don’t know, I’ll let you guys decide.

The Lead’s The Thing January 10, 2006

Posted by justinlall in Articles.
Tags: ,
7 comments

As declarer, the clue that helps me figure out the hand the most is the opening lead. There is a wealth of reliable information available from it, especially when the opponents lead count (which is very common in North America). People rarely falsecard the lead because it is also the card that helps their partner figure out the hand the most, and presumably are trying to make the most effective lead possible. There are many leads that “everyone” makes, so when they don’t you can take negative inferences as well. Here are a few common inferences to take that many people fail to think about:

Playing NT

  • When the opponents lead from a 4 card suit, they will not have a 5 card unbid suit. The reason is simple; people generally lead from their longest unbid suit. There are a few exceptions, the most obvious being if they led from a sequence like KQJT. This inference, especially if there are no unbid suits, can help you guess the distribution very accurately.
  • When an opponent leads from xxx, he is trying to make a passive lead. This generally means all of his other leads are “unsafe” and he will usually have honors in every suit. If you have to guess a side queen for instance, definitely finesse through this player. If you have bid 1 or more suits he probably has length in those suits.
  • When an opponent leads from xx against an auction like 1N-3N then one of two things is happening. He either has nothing and is trying to hit his partner, or he has everything and is trying to be safe. You should be able to figure this out very early on.
  • Many opponents will tend to lead majors on an auction like 1N-3N. If an opponent leads a 4 card minor against this auction, it’s likely that he does not have a 4 card major.
  • If an opponent leads Ace from what later turns out to be AKxxx(x), he thinks he has a side entry. If he leads low, he does not think he has a sure side entry. If you need to guess how to play the hand this inference can be useful.

Playing Suits

  • If a player leads a stiff, he does not have a trump holding like Qxx, JTxx or Kx. Qx is unlikely. If you have to guess the queen of trumps after they led a stiff, hook through their partner.
  • If you are off AK in a side suit and opening leader led a different suit, he does not have both the ace and the king. This can help you count the high cards in many cases.
  • There are some auctions where a trump lead is automatic. For instance after a 2 diamond opener showing a 3 suiter with short diamonds and then a jump to 4 hearts people will almost always lead a trump. If they do not, they have some kind of vulnerable trump holding. This is true on all “auto trump lead” auctions.
  • If a player leads an ace against a slam, he thinks he has another trick. This inference is much stronger at imps than MP (where they may be trying to hold you to 6). Tempo is an important factor here too, the quicker the ace lead the more likely the opponent is to have a side trick like the trump queen.
  • If a player underleads an ace against a partscore or game, they had no other attractive lead. Play accordingly.
  • If a player leads a trump when declarer has shown a second suit, opening leader probably holds a strong holding in that suit.
  • A trump lead is often an attempt to be passive with honors in every other suit.
  • If a player underleads an AK(QJ) at trick 1, they have a void and are trying to get partner to get in to give them a ruff.

I think you get the idea. Here are two example hands to help illustrate some of these clues.

Hand 1

A52
843
AJT2
J76

K83
K97
K984
AK4

You are in 3N on the auction 1N p 3N. You get the 2 of hearts lead to the Q and King. The opponents play 4th best. How do you tackle diamonds?

LHO has 4 hearts and RHO has 3. The rule of empty spaces makes RHO a 10:9 favorite to hold the queen of diamonds. However, there is a stronger clue. Remember that we are going to assume LHO has no other 5 card suit since he led from a 4 card suit. His possible shapes are 4423, 4432, 4441, 4414, 3433, 3442, 3424, 2443, 2434, 1444. With other 4 card suits, especially spades, he may have led that instead. It also appears he led from an unattractive holding like AJxx, but RHO could have AQx of hearts still. Overall 3433 is his most likely shape, but even if all shapes are equal there are 7 shapes where he has 3+ diamonds and only 3 where he has 1 or 2 diamonds. This makes finessing through LHO a strong favorite despite the rule of empty spaces.

Hand 2

K42
KJT3
A532
87

AJ983
Q9762
64
3

This comes from a national team game. The bidding may scare you, but north opened 1, south bid 1, north bid 2, and south jumped to 4. West thought for a long time and led a low heart. I put in the jack and RHO immediately played low. How do you play?

Clearly, LHO had underled his ace of hearts. He must have had a terrible hand to lead from because that is a very strange lead and not the slightest bit attractive. I decided that my LHO must have the queen of trumps. Accordingly, I won the queen of hearts in my hand and advanced the jack of spades. LHO shrugged and covered so I did not think he had QT doubleton and finessed the spade ten on the way back. LHO did have the Q6 of spades.

That was a spectacular hand, but not a very hard play to come up with if you are in tune with the vast information available from the opening lead.

A Missed Opportunity January 4, 2006

Posted by justinlall in Blog.
Tags: ,
6 comments

Knowing how to execute rare squeezes is not vital to the long-term success of a bridge player for that very reason; they are rare. Still, they are fun when they do come up and sometimes can win you a lot of imps. See if you can do better than my partner did on this tricky hand.

Q4
AK942
Q3
AK43

AKJT72
T63
K7
T5

After partner opens 1 you respond 1. Partner rebids 2 and you bid 2 to establish a game force. Lefty Xs and this is passed back to you. You choose to suppress the heart fit and bid 2. Partner raises to 3, and you having done a lot already simply sign off in 4. Partner has other plans and bids 5 to ask for a diamond control. Since you have one you must bid 6.

LHO leads the 9 of clubs. Plan your play then read on.

One possible line is a simple squeeze. For this to execute against RHO, LHO will need a stiff club or else he can kill your entry to the board. You will not be able to cash the AK of hearts effectively after that as you will have no board entry so the squeeze will not operate against RHO. You also need RHO to have 5+ clubs for this line to work if he guards both suits.

Another line is just to try for the QJ of hearts onside. This is only 25 % though, and we can do better.

The best line is what’s known as a trump squeeze. We need to be careful in preparation, though. The ending we need to reach is:


AK

43

2
T63

It does not matter if 1 less round of clubs has been played or not. If one hand has the club guard and the heart guard, they will have to unguard one suit. If they throw a club, play a heart to the ace, ruff a club, heart to dummy and cash your good club. If they throw a heart, cash the AK of hearts and ruff a club to cash your good heart.

Say we were to just pull trumps and then play a diamond. The defense can foil us by ducking. The count is not rectified, so we are forced to play another diamond. Now the defense can win the ace and play a club or heart locking us in dummy. The only way we can get off the board is ruffing a club which destroys the squeeze against RHO. So we must play a diamond immediately while we can still get off the board with a trump. The risk of a club ruff is negligible. LHO doubled 2 so is a huge favorite to have the ace of diamonds. He is the only one who can have a stiff given the lead, so a ruff is very unlikely.

Did you find this line of play? If not, don’t feel too bad. You won’t see this again for another 5 years.